No Atlantic Hurricanes By Sept 23; Before 1979 Became Year Zero; Swiss Glaciers Were Smaller Before; New Study Turns The Greenhouse Story Upside Down; + Climate Attribution Assumptions

Correlation dressed up with a counterfactual does not magically become causation.

The patents didn’t cause the rains.

But the press—and the public it ‘informs’—haven’t worked that one out.

No Atlantic Hurricanes By Sept 23

The Atlantic has reached late September without producing a single hurricane — the first season since 1914 to do so.

As of the National Hurricane Center’s latest full-season tally, 2026 has produced six named storms, zero hurricanes and zero major hurricanes. Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE), which combines storm strength and duration, stands at just 6.3 — 92% below the 1991–2020 norm for this point in the season.

The average Atlantic season would have produced roughly four hurricanes by now.

Closest came Fay, which peaked just below hurricane strength at 70 mph (113 km/h). But she has now fizzled, with the NHC issuing its final advisory Tuesday, Sept 22.

Not since 1914 has a season made it this far without a hurricane. That year ultimately finished with none at all, as did 1907. In 1905, the first hurricane did not arrive until Oct 8. Records before the satellite era are less certain, as storms over the open ocean could have gone undetected.

The chief culprit in 2026 is straightforward: El Niño. Strong upper-level winds have generated exceptional shear across the Atlantic and Caribbean, repeatedly tearing developing storms apart. Dry air has also worked against development.

We’re seeing an interesting media pivot.

In September 2020, The Washington Post ran the headline: “Hurricanes near U.S. coast forecast to worsen and multiply due to global warming.” The hyperactive 2020 season, it said, could be a “harbinger of the future,” citing modeling that projected increased frequency and intensity of tropical cyclones, particularly near North America:


Six years later, though, with the Atlantic historically quiet, the Post is suggesting that warming might be suppressing hurricanes:


Its Sept 16, 2026 article points to increasing atmospheric stability as a possible additional brake on development: if the upper tropical troposphere warms faster than the air below, rising air and thunderstorms can be inhibited.

While the physics of atmospheric stability is real, the attribution here is another matter. A warmer upper troposphere can suppress convection locally by making it harder for warm air below to keep rising, but 2026 is also seeing a strong El Niño—known to increase Atlantic wind shear and warm the tropical upper atmosphere. Hurricane formation also depends on humidity, shear, instability and temperatures across the wider tropics.

Six years ago, exceptional Atlantic activity was presented as a glimpse of a warming future.

Today, exceptional inactivity is also due to warming.


Before 1979 Became Year Zero

Climate history looked rather different in the IPCC’s own early reports.

Its 1990 First Assessment Report openly depicted a Medieval Warm Period followed by the Little Ice Age.

The accompanying text described roughly AD 950–1250 as “exceptionally warm” across western Europe, Iceland and Greenland.


The IPCC also once presented Northern Hemisphere sea-ice data reaching back to 1972.

It wrote that satellites had routinely mapped sea ice since the early 1970s and reported something not seen on modern Arctic charts: 1972–75 had significantly less sea ice, while just a few years later, in 1978-79, extent had surged substantially (red circle).


Today, Arctic sea-ice graphs commonly begin in 1979.

But that is not the start of satellite observations.

As late as 1995, the IPCC was still stating that neither hemisphere had shown a significant sea-ice extent trend “since 1973 when satellite measurements began.”

As shown, 1979 sits at the high end of the record. It is little wonder the Climatariat starts its charts here.


New Study Turns The Greenhouse Story Upside Down

A new study argues that Earth’s warm surface is primarily a result of convection—not CO2 trapping heat.

Earth radiates to space at an average temperature equivalent to about -18C (0F), yet the surface averages around 15C (59F) — a difference of 33C (59F).

The usual explanation credits that difference largely to greenhouse gases.

Demetris Koutsoyiannis, writing in Geosciences, argues otherwise.

As air rises, it expands and cools. As you move downward through the atmosphere, temperatures therefore increase. This vertical temperature change is called the lapse rate. Koutsoyiannis calculates that if the atmosphere had no such temperature gradient, Earth’s surface would sit near -18C (0F). Apply the observed atmospheric gradient and the surface reaches roughly 15C (59F).

In his framework, that means essentially the entire 33C difference comes from the temperature gradient established by convection.

Longwave radiation still has a role, but the paper argues it maintains this temperature structure rather than creating it.

The same argument is applied to Venus. More strongly so.

Venus’s atmosphere is about 97% CO2, yet temperatures rise by roughly 10.5C for every kilometer you descend through its 60-km-deep lower atmosphere. That alone produces around 630C (1,134F) of warming from the top of that layer to the surface.

Koutsoyiannis says this temperature gradient “fully explains” Venus’s extreme surface heat.

Convection sets the temperature gradient. Radiation adjusts to it.


Climate Attribution Assumptions

First comes the disaster. Then comes the climate attribution. Then come the headlines. The problem, according to researcher Roger Pielke Jr., is that the conclusion is often already baked into the method.

Pielke says he replicated 96 studies from World Weather Attribution (WWA), the influential group behind countless claims that climate change made a flood, heatwave or storm “X times more likely” or “X times worse.”

His criticism is this: the method does not independently prove that warming caused the change. It assumes warming is the relevant driver, then calculates the event against a cooler hypothetical world.

Pielke demonstrated the weakness by feeding the same statistical machinery absurd variables.

Using global temperature against Major League Baseball home runs, the method can seemingly show that 2019’s record 6,776 home runs would have been impossible in the climate of 1900. He also substituted global patent applications into an analysis of extreme Japanese rainfall and produced an apparent fourfold increase in rainfall risk.

Correlation dressed up with a counterfactual does not magically become causation.

The patents didn’t cause the rains.

But the press—and the public it informs—haven’t worked that one out.


5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
David
David
22 days ago

The perversity of blaming the same forces for opposite results illustrates willful blindness, but that can never be admitted.

David
David
22 days ago

The major media have become so wedded to “consensus” fiction that it will likely be many years before the “climate change” fear is allowed to fade away, with no acknowledgement of error of course. The perversity of blaming the same forces for opposite results illustrates willful blindness, but that can never be admitted. Attribution “science” was invented to support the fanciful notion that a trace gas in a churning atmosphere traps heat and controls surface temperature. None of the resulting edifice of worry and damaging policies represents actual science, so relentless propaganda has been required to sell the hoax. And, of course, the IPCC’s first assessment report has been buried.

Wayegon
Wayegon
20 days ago
Reply to  David

Consensus is not Science. Provable actions are Science. Recreate or stay at home.

Kenneth
Kenneth
21 days ago

What did you say? Excuse me? Are you trying to say that no hurricane development is because the atmosphere is warmer? That’s completely wrong! Dumbest thing I ever heard!! A colder atmosphere at mid levels will suppress tropical cyclones by producing more troughs at 500mb and TUTT features, meaning more vertical wind shear. Not the opposite! If it were warmer at 500mb, you have more ridging aloft and more instability at the surface, which means an active year, like 2005. It’s now colder at 500mb than it was back then, so you have LESS ridging at mid levels and more troughiness at that level, meaning MORE vertical shear. Don’t let these idiots and drive by media contaminate your brain cells any further than they have already! Otherwise this site will completely lose all credibility forever. Climatic cooling is the main driver for troughs in the Atlantic since 2020, which is one important reason why the East coast has NOT had any major hurricanes since 1996. More troughs in the West Atlantic shoves the Bermuda high toward the Azores, resulting in storms turning north and missing the East coast. This has been an increasing trend since 1996 – when the last major (Fran) made landfall in North Carolina. In addition, hurricanes have weakened since 1995 globally as to ACE. Climatic cooling = fewer intense hurricanes and more troughs in the Atlantic and weaker landfalls, especially further north. 30 years and ongoing now with no major landfalls on the East coast north of Jacksonville. The trend is similar with fewer intense tornadoes since 2014, especially in the Plains. That entire corridor has shifted SE due to colder springs, suppressing intense convective development and shifting the main tornado belt south and east since 2014 due to more frequent southward penetration of colder polar air. Anybody can clearly see the reason for this trend!! Not one F5 tornado has touched down anywhere since 2014 in the main belt area south of North Dakota. Forget the one in 2025 which they claimed to have reached that level – that took 4 months for NOAA to upgrade, which is suspicious and questionable. In summary, fewer landfalling hurricanes and fewer strong tornadoes is a strong case for climatic cooling. End of story!

Moffin
Moffin
21 days ago
Reply to  Kenneth

Hi Kenneth.
A gap between paragraphs would allow your writing to be more easily comprehensible.
Thank you.

Moffin
Moffin
21 days ago

Dr David Denning’ 5 minute submission to congress. Video.

“We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period!”

Deb
Deb
21 days ago
Reply to  Moffin

Very interesting! Do we have any idea when this presentation was made to Congress?

Moffin
Moffin
21 days ago
Reply to  Deb

15 years ago, darlink.

Deb
Deb
20 days ago
Reply to  Moffin

I guess it didn’t do much good then, did it? 🤔

Moffin
Moffin
19 days ago
Reply to  Deb

Hi Darlink. It is like a seesaw. Add a little more weight to one end and the seesaw tilts the other way.

Deb
Deb
19 days ago
Reply to  Moffin

Hello, Best Beloved. I am currently studying the fall of civilizations. The seesaw is a perfect metaphor for the mechanism that seems to bring down all civilizations and is currently bringing down ours. They change from a preponderance of producers to a preponderance of administrators, one regulation and one bureaucrat at a time. Our seesaw has begun to tip. If Congress would start repealing laws and the bureaucrats would take up farming or carpentry, we might be saved. Fat chance! 😒 In other words, too many laws and too many lawyers eventually strangle all civilizations. Quell surprise!

Wayegon
Wayegon
20 days ago
Reply to  Deb

Ya like this Weather Deb?
I do…its a hell of a lot better than 95F.
But all the wooly worms I have seen are solid BLACK, our horses are growing their Winter Coats already AND Persimmons have spoons.
So stock up wood and supplies for a Winter like 1978!!!

Deb
Deb
20 days ago
Reply to  Wayegon

Don’t go too far out on that limb before you start cutting, lol! 😄

Moffin
Moffin
19 days ago
Reply to  Wayegon

The poor little palomino was frightened by the big bad rattlesnake.

Deb
Deb
19 days ago
Reply to  Moffin

Perhaps when the GSM gets here, all the rattlesnakes will go underground.🥶

jay
jay
21 days ago

By the time the dire predictions of sustained and worsening global warming were beginning to fall flat, the climate PTB had fully realized just how gullible was most of the headline-reading public. It was an easy transition to Climate Change mania, where no matter the weather conditions, all could be blamed on said Climate Change and the bulk of the public would buy it.

As a public scare tactic, standalone GW was running out of steam, deservedly, so the more all-encompassing term was rolled out with massive publicity.

jay
jay
21 days ago

Btw, I did not find in the article a reference to this portion of the headline:
Swiss Glaciers Were Smaller Before;

17
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x