ELECTROVERSE

It gives journalists, activists and politicians a clean causal line they could never prove on their own. Weather goes in. Propaganda comes out.

The IPCC has quietly removed ~3C of projected warming — the difference between the full catastrophe script and a manageable, arguably prosperous, future.

Names are useful when they strengthen the consensus. Objections are discarded when they threaten it.

The paper's press release sold it as a "triple whammy of climate chaos." There is one problem. The ice had already rebounded.

Official data show Greenland’s losses have been trending lower for years — the exact opposite of the one-way acceleration script still sold by the Climate Establishment.

The paper’s finding is hard to spin: from 1980 to 2023, the western North Pacific shows declining cyclone activity. This is not the "catastrophe story" sold to the public.

There is a clear shift underway inside the 'climate establishment', and many of the true believers are starting to look around and wonder why the script is changing.

Solar Cycle 25 is missing its Earth-directed "superflare." This new study identifies two high-probability windows.

The authors do not identify CO2 as the driver of the warming mechanism examined. In fact, carbon dioxide doesn’t even get a mention.

The isotope record is one line of evidence. The temperature record is another. Both point to a climate system that was moving hard long before modern emissions.